Quick Answer
Short reports, legacy formats β BibTeX still usable
Custom styles, multilingual docs, modern workflows β Go with BibLaTeX + biber

π‘
Short reports, legacy formats β BibTeX still usable
Custom styles, multilingual docs, modern workflows β Go with BibLaTeX + biber
Feature | BibTeX | BibLaTeX |
Release | 1980s | ~2006+ |
Backend |
|
|
Style control | via | Fully customizable in LaTeX |
Citation commands | Limited | Extensive: |
Multilingual support | Weak | Good ( |
Field extensibility | Fixed | Extensible ( |
Journal style support | Decreasing | Modern journals moving to BibLaTeX |
Easy customization without editing .bst files
Multilingual support is much better
Modern metadata fields like DOI, URL, ePrints
Modular configuration β load only what you need
Actively maintained with strong community support
You must use a specific .bst style mandated by a journal
You are working with very old documents
You need the absolute minimal setup for simple reports
% Example with BibLaTeX
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=authoryear]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{refs.bib}Build sequence changes: pdflatex β biber β pdflatex Γ2
Make sure biber is installed in your TeX distro
.bib files work the same β you can reuse your existing data
Murfy supports DOI to BibTeX conversion, duplicate cleanup, and entry suggestions
BibTeX generated works with both BibTeX and BibLaTeX
You can generate .bib online and export to Overleaf, VS Code, etc.
In 2026, if you're starting a new LaTeX project, BibLaTeX with biber is your best bet. Itβs more flexible, modern, and easier to adapt to multilingual and style-specific requirements.
Best Online LaTeX Editor, Murfy